Criminal Law Casebook - Developments in leading appellate courts

Aimed at promoting the study of technical aspects of criminal law and procedure, this site considers selected cases from the top appeal courts of Australia, Canada, the UK, the USA, the European Court of Human Rights and New Zealand. From August 2004 there have been approximately 800 entries, including book reviews.

Friday, January 31, 2014

Erroneous concessions

›
It would be manifestly unfair for a defendant to be held to a concession that was made because of a mistake of law: R v Mackle (Northern I...
Monday, January 20, 2014

Stop the discussion!

›
The dissent in R v MacDonald , 2014 SCC 3  (17 January 2014) is so cogently reasoned that one wonders why the majority didn’t refer to it or...
Monday, December 23, 2013

When your thought becomes my experience

›
Another aspect of B(SC12/2013) v R [ 2013] NZSC 151 (19 December 2013) is its varieties of judicial interpretation of ss 40(3)(b) and 4...
Friday, December 20, 2013

Perverse acquittals and the limits of the law

›
Whether you are a stranded speluncean explorer or a shipwrecked sailor adrift and starving, the law applies to you. Even where you enter in...
Thursday, December 19, 2013

Control: peaceable possession of land

›
Pronouns and political correctness: "his", or "his or her"? Section 56(1) of the Crimes Act 1961 [NZ] has been politi...
Tuesday, December 10, 2013

When is a judicial development too late?

›
A simply-defined statutory offence may require detailed judicial development. Pending such development and final determination by the highe...
Saturday, December 07, 2013

Common law fairness and the Evidence Act 2006[NZ]

›
To what extent does the Evidence Act 2006 [NZ] exclude the common law discretion to rule inadmissible evidence that was obtained, not thro...
Thursday, November 28, 2013

Culpable recklessness and innocent negligence: inferences from conduct

›
How does a court decide what a defendant foresaw about the consequences of his acts? The difference between foreseeing and not foreseeing...
Monday, November 18, 2013

Looking into oral argument about causation

›
Oral argument on appeals is quite an interesting thing, as you can hear and read in relation to Burrage v United States (Docket No 12-751...
Sunday, November 17, 2013

A diligent and simple people

›
Two recent cases from the Supreme Court of Canada: Diligence and freshness In R v Hay , 2013 SCC 61 (8 November 2013) on the issue of ...
Friday, November 15, 2013

Perverse acquittals

›
A conviction can only be "according to law", but an acquittal need not be. We don't often mention the jury's power to r...
Friday, November 01, 2013

For the notebook ...

›
One never knows when the following recent decisions of the High Court of Australia and of the Supreme Court of Canada may be useful: Judges ...
Friday, October 18, 2013

Oyez!

›
Of peripheral interest to criminal lawyers are a couple of recent decisions of the United Kingdom Supreme Court. Prisoners and voting rig...
Thursday, October 10, 2013

Unnecessarily attacking the fundamentals

›
Even the most robust of the fundamentals of the criminal law can be modified by statute. When that happens, the fundamental should retain it...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Don Mathias
I practised as a barrister from December 1978 to retirement in February 2018. In 1980 I completed my PhD in criminal law. I have taught Advanced Criminal Law at the University of Auckland, and I wrote "Misuse of Drugs", our textbook on drug offences published by Thomson Reuters NZ Ltd. I was a contributing and updating author of "Adams on Criminal Law", and co-author of the first three editions of "Criminal Procedure in New Zealand" (Thomson Reuters, 3rd ed 2019).
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.